US Lawmaker Reintroduces CBDC Bill After Trump EO Bans Digital Dollar

Introduction: A New Chapter in Digital Currency

In a significant move, U.S. Representative Tom Emmer has reintroduced legislation aimed at preventing federal banks from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC), following an executive order by President Donald Trump that banned the creation of a digital dollar[1]. This development marks a crucial moment in the ongoing debate about the role of digital currencies in the U.S. financial system. Let’s delve into the details and implications of this legislative push.

Background: The CBDC Debate

Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are digital versions of a country’s fiat currency, issued and regulated by the central bank. The concept has gained traction worldwide, with countries like China and Israel actively exploring or implementing their own CBDCs[1]. However, in the U.S., there has been a growing resistance to the idea, primarily due to concerns about privacy and government surveillance[3].

The Legislation: CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act

Rep. Emmer’s bill, known as the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act, seeks to amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit federal banks from issuing a digital dollar or any similar digital asset[1]. This move is supported by roughly 100 Republicans and follows an earlier version that passed the House in May 2024 but stalled in the Senate[1]. The legislation is designed to address concerns that a CBDC could be used to monitor consumer transactions, potentially infringing on financial privacy[3].

Trump’s Executive Order: A Ban on CBDCs

President Trump’s executive order, issued on January 23, 2025, explicitly prohibits federal agencies from pursuing the creation of a U.S. CBDC[1][3]. This move aligns with the legislative efforts by Rep. Emmer and other Republicans, who argue that a CBDC could give the government undue control over financial transactions[3]. Trump’s order also reflects a broader strategy to support private digital currencies, such as stablecoins, rather than a government-issued CBDC[3].

International Context: Other Countries’ CBDC Initiatives

While the U.S. is moving away from CBDCs, other countries are actively developing their own digital currencies. For instance, Israel recently released a preliminary design for a digital shekel, and the European Central Bank is exploring the possibility of a digital euro[1]. These international developments highlight the global interest in digital currencies and the potential for CBDCs to play a significant role in cross-border payments and financial systems[2].

Conclusion: A Future Without CBDCs?

The reintroduction of the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act and Trump’s executive order banning CBDCs signal a clear direction for U.S. policy on digital currencies. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether these efforts will succeed in permanently blocking the development of a U.S. CBDC. The implications are significant, not only for financial privacy but also for the future of digital payments in the U.S.

—

Sources:
– Cointelegraph
– Centre for e-Governance
– Payments Dive
– Ethio Diaspora Hub
– Binance